Charles Berlitz, The Lost Ship of Noah (W.H. Allen & Co: London, 1987)
Berlitz's exploration of the Great Flood and the search for Noah's Ark is much better than it should have been. It's a compact 187 pages but still gives the impression of covering significant ground at a slow amble.
The book is best described as an examination of different aspects of the tale of the Flood. Each chapter more-or-less stands alone. One covers Flood myths from around the world (and the different personages 'Noah' has taken). Another covers the difficulties of climbing Mount Ararat, and still another the verbal accounts of sightings of the Ark in the mountains of Armenia. This has a few drawbacks. The book seems fairly undisciplined and no real line of argument emerges. Sometimes information seems to be included simply because the author was aware of it rather than because it was relevant. I'm not sure why the final chapter discussed the prospects of the world ending in 1999 (pp. 171-187).
The author seems to have made a genuine effort to be objective. For example, he recounts that timbers brought which Fernand Navarra claimed to have recovered from Ararat were variously dated to 5000BC and 560AD (pp. 94-95). On the other hand, he studiously avoids commenting on how documentary evidence of Ark sightings can miraculously never be located. For example, the report of a Russian search for the Ark was apparently destroyed by Leon Trotsky (p. 33). People who have photographed the Ark will show the pictures to others but not release them to the press or allow them to be copied (pp. 41-42). A statement from an eyewitness is mysteriously destroyed in a house fire (p. 150). Newpaper reports can somehow never be found (pp. 42 and 150). He is also remarkably unselective about his material. He accepts as genuine an absurd claim by a man in Arizona to by the son of Tsar Nicholas II (p. 37). He quotes from a fourteenth century Ark sighting by Sir John Mandeville, despite Mandeville being a fictional character! (p. 18). And his account of flood legends from around the world seems to be drawn from secondary sources quoting secondary sources quoting secondary sources quoting ... you get the idea: what the primary source material might be is anyone's guess (pp. 129-136).
Fundamentally, this book is less history and more a collection of folklore. It's worth flipping through on a long train ride, but don't take it too seriously.